You are blending a multitude of separate issues into one. Of course I am a partisan in the realm of politics (never said I was not). Of course I am biased on many things (never said I was not). That is neither here nor there on the issue at hand: should a book (any book--I really don't care what the book is) be summarily removed from schools and from the access of all students because a parent didn't like a paragraph in it that she read about on Facebook.

If somebody comes along and demands the Bible be removed or a book by Tucker Carlson be removed or anything else, I will fight to keep that book accessible in school libraries as well, because I have been 100% clear and consistent without bias or partisanship when it comes to books: No book bans. Period. That is my agenda, no book bans. That is not a partisan agenda. I am sure there are at least some conservatives who agree with me, as conservatives used to be about individual liberty and making sure the heavy hand of government stays out of our lives. I have in the past, in other articles, loudly denounced liberals and Democrats who have called for the removal of To Kill a Mockingbird. In this article here, I emphasized the book bans du jour of CRT and LGBTQ. But rest assured, if the flip side occurs and liberals try to remove any books they deem offensive, I will be howling just as loud.

Access to books in an educational setting is not, and should not, be a matter defined by political affiliation. It should be apolitical and must be apolitical. If you find that itself to be a political statement ... well that is a problem. We are at an impasse, clearly.